Nothing on this site is intended for human or veterinary use. PeptideBasics101 exists for general awareness: it collects publicly available information from across the internet and keeps it in one place for research and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here is medical advice. Statements here are our summaries of public sources and have not been reviewed or endorsed by the FDA or any regulatory body. This is information gathering, not guidance.

PeptideBasics101

peptide

Semax

A synthetic seven-amino-acid peptide built from a fragment of the hormone ACTH and registered in Russia as nasal drops; not FDA approved, withdrawn from the FDA's 503A Category 2 in 2026, then narrowly recommended for the compounding list by an FDA advisory committee against FDA staff advice.

Data refreshed 2026-09-24 · Based on 8 published references

Names

Also called: Semax acetate, ACTH(4-7)-Pro-Gly-Pro, MEHFPGP

Regulatory (US)

FDA approval: none

503A compounding: unknown

Molecule

Formula: C37H51N9O10S

MW: 813.9 g/mol

CAS: 80714-61-0

PubChem entry

Sequence: Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro

Origin

Discovered by: Research team led by Nikolai Myasoedov and Igor Ashmarin, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

Developer: Institute of Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences

What it is

Semax is a lab-made chain of seven amino acids. Four of them copy positions 4 to 7 of ACTH, a pituitary hormone that normally signals the adrenal glands to release cortisol. The other three (proline, glycine, proline) were added so the chain would survive longer in the body. Its developers report that it does not stimulate the adrenal glands, and it has been studied for effects on the brain rather than on hormones.

In Russia, Semax is a registered medicine in the form of nose drops in two strengths. It is not approved in the United States. Most of what is known about it comes from Russian laboratories and Russian-language clinical reports, many of them small.

Semax is H-Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro-OH (C37H51N9O10S, 813.9 g/mol, CAS 80714-61-0): ACTH(4-7) extended at the C-terminus with the glyproline Pro-Gly-Pro to slow proteolysis. The developing institute reports that it has neither corticotropic nor melanocyte-stimulating activity (Kolomin et al. 2013).

No specific receptor has been identified. Dolotov et al. (2006) reported saturable binding sites in rat basal forebrain and higher BDNF protein after exposure; other rodent studies report rapid changes in Bdnf, Ngf and TrkB expression, and in immune- and vascular-related transcripts after experimental focal ischaemia (Medvedeva et al. 2014). Further rodent findings include anticoagulant and antiplatelet effects, partly attributed to the Pro-Gly-Pro metabolite, and potentiation of amphetamine-induced striatal dopamine release.

Pharmacokinetics are known only from rats. Labelled Semax is hydrolysed quickly by aminopeptidases and angiotensin-converting enzyme, mainly to Pro-Gly-Pro. In the rat studies summarised by FDA, about 0.07% of the dose reached the brain after intranasal dosing, against about 0.005% after intravenous dosing. FDA found no human pharmacokinetic study by any route.

Who made it and when

A team led by Nikolai Myasoedov and Igor Ashmarin began the work in the late 1970s at what is now the Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow. Natural ACTH fragments act for only 30 to 60 minutes, and the aim was a version whose effects lasted longer. The result was developed into 0.1% nose drops and, by 2001, a stronger 1% version aimed at patients after a stroke. Both appear on Russia’s state register of medicines. No Western pharmaceutical company has taken it through development.

Kolomin et al. (2013), writing from the developing institute, date the programme to the late 1970s under N.F. Myasoedov and I.P. Ashmarin, with the explicit goal of extending the 30–60 minute activity of ACTH(4-10). The Pro-Gly-Pro extension was chosen because glyprolines resist serum peptidases; the intermediate Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro formed in serum is itself reported to retain neurotrophic activity. “Semax 0.1%” nasal drops came first, and “Semax 1%” followed by 2001 for post-stroke use, according to the same authors. FDA’s 2026 review confirms that 0.1% and 1% nasal drops are on the Russian State Register of Medicines.

Semax has no USAN or INN, no USP or NF monograph, and no monograph in the European, Japanese or International Pharmacopoeias. FDA noted that both nominators’ certificates of analysis mixed free-base and acetate identifiers, one reason it judged neither form well characterised. No US patent held by a pharmaceutical developer was verified for this article, so none is listed.

What the data say

The research falls into two groups. The first is animal work, mostly in rats, where Semax given into the nose or by injection has been studied after blocked blood flow to the brain and in tests of memory, pain, mood and blood clotting. These studies report protective effects and changes in brain growth-factor genes, and almost all come from the developer’s own institute.

The second group is human studies. These are mostly small, mostly published in Russian, and often lack a placebo group or blinding. They include stroke patients, people with migraine or facial nerve pain, healthy volunteers and children. The FDA reviewed the English-language evidence in 2026 and found it insufficient to show effectiveness for any use it examined. No trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

All human exposure identified by FDA (2026) was intranasal: roughly 33–47 healthy adults, 69 adults with medical conditions (chronic cerebral ischaemia, migraine, trigeminal neuralgia, peptic ulcer) and 451 children with depression or tics, several reported only as meeting abstracts. Koroleva et al. (1996) gave a single 0.5 mg/kg intranasal dose to 12 adults with migraine; 4 of 12 reported the headache stopping at 90–120 minutes, with no control group or blinding. Gusev et al. (2018, in Russian, n=110 after ischaemic stroke) reported higher plasma BDNF and better Barthel index scores with two 10-day courses of 6,000 µg/day, in subgroups without stated randomisation or blinding.

Most cerebral-ischaemia trials exist only in Russian and were set aside by FDA under its translation rule. No study used subcutaneous injection, and there are no human pharmacokinetic data. FDA concluded that the evidence was insufficient to show effectiveness for cerebral ischaemia, migraine or trigeminal neuralgia. Independent replication outside the developer’s institute is limited.

Regulatory picture

Approval: no medicine containing Semax is approved by the FDA, and registration in Russia does not carry over to the United States. Compounding: in September 2023 the FDA put Semax in “Category 2”, the group of substances pharmacies should not compound from, citing possible immune reactions and impurities. By April 2026 the FDA listed it as withdrawn from that category by its nominators, and FDA staff then reviewed it on the agency’s own initiative. In July 2026 an FDA advisory committee voted narrowly to recommend adding Semax to the list of allowed compounding ingredients, even though FDA staff had advised against it. The vote is not binding, and the FDA had not made a final decision when this was written. Enforcement: FDA warning letters to two compounding businesses, in 2020 and 2021, named Semax among ingredients they should not have compounded.

Approval: none. No US IND-stage programme could be verified.

Compounding: “Semax (heptapeptide)” entered Category 2 of the interim 503A policy on 2023-09-29. FDA’s safety-risk page (updated 2026-04-22) lists it among substances withdrawn by the nominators, and it appears in no category of FDA’s 503A nominations list updated 2026-05-14. It is not on the 503A bulks list (21 CFR 216.23), so this article records compounding status as unknown.

FDA’s briefing document (dated 2026-05-11) evaluated the free base and acetate for cerebral ischaemia, migraine and trigeminal neuralgia and concluded that the criteria weigh against inclusion. It cited incomplete characterisation (impurities, aggregates, endotoxin), immunogenicity concerns for injectable and nasal products, missing information on nasal-spray container and pump systems, possible bleeding risk and dopaminergic effects in rodents, and insufficient efficacy data. On 2026-07-24 the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee nonetheless voted in favour; published accounts give the tally as 8 votes to 5, and official minutes had not been posted when this was written. Notice-and-comment rulemaking is required before inclusion takes effect.

Doses reported in trials

Doses reported in studies, exactly as the cited trial reported them. They are not personal dosing instructions. Population, route and schedule matter more than the number.

No trials catalogued yet for this page.

Enforcement history

Reported side effects

Interactions

Not catalogued yet.

Contraindications

Not catalogued yet.

Storage

No FDA-approved product exists, so there is no US label storage data. FDA's 2026 review cites a report that lyophilised free base is stable for 4 years when stored at −20 °C. Storage statements from research suppliers are supplier claims, not verified data.

Product characteristics

Form: Synthetic linear heptapeptide, free base or acetate salt; registered in Russia as 0.1% and 1% nasal drops

Stability: Broken down in blood and brain tissue from the N-terminus, mainly to the tripeptide Pro-Gly-Pro (rat data)

Compound information

Synthetic heptapeptide, free base (C37H51N9O10S) or acetate salt (C39H55N9O12S, 874.0 g/mol per FDA). No USP or NF monograph and no USAN or INN. FDA noted that nomination paperwork mixed free-base and acetate identifiers. No safety data sheet from a regulated drug manufacturer was found.

References

This page summarises the published sources below. PeptideBasics101 does no original research. Trial doses and results are reported as the cited study or label reported them. Sources can themselves be wrong or superseded; if you find a statement here that does not match its source, please tell us through our corrections process. Sources were last checked on 2026-09-24.

  1. FDA briefing document: Semax-related bulk drug substances (Semax free base and Semax acetate), PCAC July 23–24, 2026 (fda.gov)
  2. STAT News: FDA advisory panel narrowly rejects compounding of one peptide, backs two others (July 24, 2026) (statnews.com)
  3. FDA: certain bulk drug substances for use in compounding that may present significant safety risks (Category 2 and withdrawn substances) (fda.gov)
  4. Kolomin T et al. A new generation of drugs: synthetic peptides based on natural regulatory peptides (Semax and Selank). Neuroscience & Medicine 2013 (doi.org)
  5. Dolotov OV et al. Semax binds specifically and increases levels of BDNF protein in rat basal forebrain. J Neurochem 2006 (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  6. Medvedeva EV et al. The peptide Semax affects the expression of genes related to the immune and vascular systems in rat brain focal ischemia. BMC Genomics 2014 (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  7. Gusev EI et al. The efficacy of Semax in patients at different stages of ischemic stroke (in Russian). Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2018 (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  8. PubChem: Semax (CID 9811102) (pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

Clinical trial entries in the table above link to their ClinicalTrials.gov registry records. Spotted an error? See corrections.

Ask Sgt. Pep